Back to PoliciesShareable Card

Court Case

Giles v. Harris

The Supreme Court refused to grant meaningful relief to Black plaintiffs challenging Alabama's disfranchising constitution, effectively declining to use federal judicial power to restore their voting rights.

Year

1903

Impact

Negative

Status

Active

Party

Unknown

Era

Jim Crow and Disenfranchisement

Impact Context

The ruling signaled that federal courts would not reliably intervene against systematic Black disfranchisement in the Jim Crow South.

What This Policy Did

The ruling signaled that federal courts would not reliably intervene against systematic Black disfranchisement in the Jim Crow South.

Share This Card

This page is meant to stand on its own. The link is stable and readable out of context.

https://equitystack.org/card/policy/giles-v-harris-114

Sources

Giles v. Harris, 189 U.S. 475 (1903)

Justia U.S. Supreme Court Center • Archive • Feb 23, 1903

Decision text showing the Court's refusal to meaningfully remedy Alabama disfranchisement.