Loving v. Virginia
This page analyzes a single policy using structured scoring, historical evidence, source quality, and measurable outcomes.
Summary
The Supreme Court ruled that laws banning interracial marriage were unconstitutional.
How to Read This Record
Impact Reading
Very high documented impact
Evidence Base
Limited evidence from Government sources.
Data Completeness
Good record with 1 source and 1 metric.
Outcome Summary
Invalidated anti-miscegenation laws nationwide and reinforced equal protection in family life and marriage.
Categories
Impact Scores
This score is a structured measure of how directly and materially this policy affected Black communities, weighted by evidence, durability, and equity. Harm offset reduces the total score.
Total Impact Score
38
Directness
5
How explicitly the policy targeted or affected Black communities.
Material Impact
4
The practical real-world effect on conditions, rights, or outcomes.
Evidence
5
Strength of sourcing and historical support for the assessment.
Durability
5
How lasting the effects of the policy were over time.
Equity
5
Whether the policy advanced fairness, inclusion, or equal access.
Harm Offset
0
Any offsetting harms, limitations, exclusions, or contradictory effects that reduce the total.
Scoring Notes: Major constitutional equality ruling.
Metrics
Legality of interracial marriage bans
Interracial couples including Black Americans • United States
Before
1.00
1966 • binary
After
0.00
1967 • binary
Methodology: Represents Supreme Court invalidation of interracial marriage bans.
Suggested Relationships
These policies may be related based on shared categories, era, and proximity in time.
1968 • Court Case • Unknown party
Civil Rights Era • Positive
Shared Categories: 2 • Year Distance: 1
1956 • Court Case • Unknown party
Civil Rights Era • Positive
Shared Categories: 2 • Year Distance: 11
1971 • Court Case • Unknown party
Post Civil Rights Era • Positive
Shared Categories: 2 • Year Distance: 4
1978 • Court Case • Unknown party
Post Civil Rights Era • Mixed
Shared Categories: 2 • Year Distance: 11
1987 • Court Case • Unknown party
Post Civil Rights Era • Negative
Shared Categories: 2 • Year Distance: 20
1989 • Law • Democratic Party
Contemporary Era • Blocked
Shared Categories: 2 • Year Distance: 22
1939 • Court Case • Unknown party
Jim Crow and Disenfranchisement • Positive
Shared Categories: 2 • Year Distance: 28
1968 • Law • Democratic Party
Civil Rights Era • Positive
Shared Categories: 1 • Year Distance: 1