Back to scorecards

Legislator Record

Rep. Cicilline, David N. [D-RI-1]

House • D • RI

Net Impact: 14.08Avg Bill Score: 7.04Primary Sponsor: 0Cosponsor: 2Band: Lower HalfFuture Bills: 2

Current Snapshot

Weighted from current tracked reform bills, sponsorship role strength, future-bill priority, and how far each bill has advanced.

Net Impact

14.08

Avg Bill Score

7.04

Tracked Bills

2

Direct Impact Bills

2

Overall Rank

#245 / 375

Lower Half • 35th percentile

Chamber Rank

#230 / 323

29th percentile in House

Party Rank

#243 / 336

28th percentile in D

Current snapshot uses tracked reform bills only. Scores weight primary sponsorship more than cosponsorship, increase with higher-priority future-bill matches, and give additional credit to bills that advanced beyond introduction.

Tracked Bill Roles

Bills this legislator is linked to as a sponsor or cosponsor in the currently loaded scorecard data.

Future Bill Positions

Future-bill concepts connected to this legislator through the linked tracked legislation.

Issue Area Focus

Where this legislator's currently tracked reform-bill activity is concentrated.

Criminal Justice

Highest linked priority: High

Future Bills: 1Sponsor: 0Cosponsor: 1Critical: 0High: 1

Healthcare

Highest linked priority: High

Future Bills: 1Sponsor: 0Cosponsor: 1Critical: 0High: 1

Related Explainers

Explainers connected to this legislator through the future-bill concepts linked to their tracked activity.

Criminal Justice

Crime Statistics in Context: How the 13/50 Claim Is Used and Misused

The 13/50 claim is a common debate talking point that combines a population figure with a crime statistic in a way that often strips out context. Understanding what the numbers measure, what they do not measure, and how crime data are produced is essential for evaluating the claim accurately.

Linked Future Bills: 1Highest Priority: High

Constitutional Law

Equal Protection Under the Law: What It Means vs. How Its Been Applied

The Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment guarantees that no state shall deny any person equal protection under the law. While this principle is foundational to American law, its application has historically been inconsistent, with significant gaps between legal guarantees and real-world outcomes.

Linked Future Bills: 1Highest Priority: High

Criminal Justice

Mass Incarceration in the United States: Policy vs. Outcome

Mass incarceration refers to the significant increase in the U.S. prison population over the past several decades. While often attributed solely to crime rates, policy decisions, sentencing laws, and enforcement practices played a major role in driving this growth.

Linked Future Bills: 1Highest Priority: High

Criminal Justice

Sentencing Disparities in the United States: Law, Enforcement, and Unequal Outcomes

Sentencing disparities in the United States refer to differences in punishment that can emerge across race, class, geography, and offense type. Although the law is often described as neutral, sentencing outcomes have frequently reflected unequal enforcement, policy design, and institutional discretion.

Linked Future Bills: 1Highest Priority: High

Related Policies

Policy records reached through the explainers and future-bill concepts tied to this legislator.

Rep. Cicilline, David N. [D-RI-1] | EquityStack