Policy • History • ImpactPromise Tracker Report
This score reflects documented outcomes, not campaign promises alone. It shows how presidential records affected Black communities using reviewed actions, outcomes, and source-backed evidence.
Start with the score below, then open the timeline or linked Promise Tracker records when you want more context.
A quick view of the highest and lowest net scores based on currently tracked records. Scores reflect available data and may change as additional records are added.
Barack Obama
80.00Lyndon B. Johnson
80.00Woodrow Wilson
80.00Calvin Coolidge
-80.00Harry S. Truman
0.00Woodrow Wilson
80.00This report tracks what government actions led to, checks the public evidence behind those outcomes, and rolls the documented results into a president-level score.
Each score starts with public Promise Tracker records that connect a promise to actions, outcomes, and supporting sources.
Reviewers classify what happened as Positive, Negative, Mixed, or Blocked based on the real effect on Black communities.
Source support matters. Stronger public evidence gives an outcome more weight than a weaker or thinly documented record.
Weighted outcomes are combined into a president-level score, so the final number reflects documented results, not campaign language alone.
Positive means helped, Negative means harmed, Mixed means both, and Blocked means the effort did not fully take effect. Only reviewed public records are included here.
This score reflects currently tracked records in EquityStack. Coverage may expand as additional records and sources are added.
This view reflects a smaller set of currently tracked records.
This public view rolls up curated Promise Tracker records into a president-level report. Records are manually reviewed, outcomes are evidence-backed, and the underlying source trail remains visible on each Promise Tracker page.
Promise Records
5
Visible curated records in this report state
Outcomes
5
Documented outcomes used in this view
Source References
9
Visible source-backed references across the current report state
This report does not include staging items, internal admin review states, or unpublished editorial notes.
Scores are based on documented real-world outcomes, not just promises or enacted laws. Each outcome is classified as positive, negative, mixed, or blocked, then weighted by evidence strength and available source support before president totals are aggregated.
Outcome Types
4
Positive, Negative, Mixed, and Blocked
Evidence Weighting
Active
Stronger evidence carries more weight
Source Support
Included
Outcome records incorporate source counts
Aggregation
By President
President scores roll up from outcome-based-v1
Open this section for timeline controls, topic or comparison filters, share links, saved states, and print or PDF tools after you have read the main report.
Start with the standard report, then switch to the timeline when you want chronological context without changing the underlying scoring model.
Limit the current report view to one policy topic using the records already loaded for this page.
Use this optional filter to show only records that already have outcome summaries, impact direction, and at least one linked source in the public scoring model.
This filter is off by default so non-ready records remain visible for context.
Use this direct link when you need to reopen the exact report state later, including filters, view mode, and comparison context.
A compact label for the current report state so it is easier to save, reuse, or share.
Save the current report state in this browser and reopen it later with the same link and visible mode context.
Current Snapshot
Courts / Housing / Civil Rights · Timeline · Outcome
Timeline view · Scoring model: outcome-based-v1 · Topic: Courts / Housing / Civil Rights
No saved snapshots yet. Save the current view to keep a reusable local record in this browser.
These summary signals describe the current score corpus as a whole. They help identify the dominant impact mix and the main topic area shaping the report.
Total Outcomes
5
Documented outcomes included in the live model
Impact Distribution
3/1/1/0
Positive, Negative, Mixed, and Blocked counts
Dominant Topic
Courts / Housing / Civil Rights
Largest absolute contribution across all presidents
This report summarizes Promise Tracker records into a president-level accountability view. It remains tied to the underlying promise, action, and outcome records rather than operating as a separate product surface.
This standalone scoring engine computes simple outcome-based scores, rolls them up to promises, and aggregates them to presidents without changing the live scoring system.
high: Outcome has impact direction and high evidence strength.
medium: Outcome has impact direction but evidence strength is medium or unspecified.
low: Outcome data is missing, incomplete, or marked with low evidence strength.
This chronological view reuses the current report's scoring results and adds simple relationship cues where Promise Tracker records are directly connected.
This view shows how scored records unfold over time and where the tracker has explicit historical relationships between them.
Woodrow Wilson
Democratic PartyNov 5, 1917
President score: 80.00
Model: outcome-based-v1
Courts / Housing / Civil Rights
Buchanan v. Warley invalidates Louisville's residential segregation ordinancePromise outcomes trend net positive across 1 scored outcomes (1 positive).
Calvin Coolidge
Republican PartyMay 24, 1926
President score: -80.00
Model: outcome-based-v1
Courts / Housing / Civil Rights
Supreme Court lets enforcement of a racially restrictive housing covenant stand in Corrigan v. BuckleyPromise outcomes trend net negative across 1 scored outcomes (1 negative).
Harry S. Truman
Democratic PartyMay 3, 1948
President score: 0.00
Model: outcome-based-v1
Courts / Housing / Civil Rights
Supreme Court bars judicial enforcement of racially restrictive covenants in Shelley v. KraemerPromise outcomes are currently neutral across 1 scored outcomes (1 mixed).
Lyndon B. Johnson
Democratic PartyJun 17, 1968
President score: 80.00
Model: outcome-based-v1
Courts / Housing / Civil Rights
Supreme Court holds that 42 U.S.C. 1982 bars private racial discrimination in property transactions in Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co.Promise outcomes trend net positive across 1 scored outcomes (1 positive).
Barack Obama
Democratic PartyJun 25, 2015
President score: 80.00
Model: outcome-based-v1
Courts / Housing / Civil Rights
Supreme Court holds that disparate-impact claims are cognizable under the Fair Housing Act in Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. Inclusive Communities Project, Inc.Promise outcomes trend net positive across 1 scored outcomes (1 positive).
Tell us whether this page helped, and optionally leave a short note.
Responses are lightweight and do not require an account.